Kartrin Anacker, social inclusion, and housing
ABSTRACT: Racial and ethnic inequality has manifested itself in wealth ownership and access to quality housing. Home ownership is considered a good basis on which to build equity. Whereas property values and their appreciation have been analyzed in those inner city neighborhoods that have high proportions of racially and ethnically underrepresented groups, not much systematic research has been undertaken on these issues in homogeneous versus mixed-race suburbs. By analyzing census tracts within select counties across the United States with weighted least squares (WLS) regressions, this article investigates differences among suburban census tracts in terms of several factors, including property values and their appreciation rates and factors, that have influenced property values. Based on the results, it is concluded that the assumption that home ownership in the suburbs leads to the building of housing wealth needs to be differentiated.
Anacker comes to the conclusion that home ownership isn’t always a route to higher asset wealth, and that outcomes depends on the suburb.
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
- Dolly Cepeda and Sonja Johnson, two stories seldom told about Dodgers Stadium or Chavez Ravine
- How to annoy people with red geraniums and hot pink petunias
- John McPhee on Writing at the New Yorker
- Natural resource dependence
- TOD, gentrification, Treehugger and why environmental justice advocates get annoyed with so-called environmentalists
- Happy Birthday, Malcolm X
- PricePoints: Martin Krieger and I start a group blog on what we are reading
- The Solari Board at Union Station in New Haven
- The "I don't owe you shit" consumerist ethic can go away right now
- Street vendors and safe streets