Quinn Norton’s excellent piece on Occupy in Wired
via Crooked Timber and bunch of other places, Quinn Norton’s amazing piece on the good and the bad of Occupy.
I am still trying to make sense of Occupy. I do know that for me, it did expose a shrill hypocrisy among many in the US who give lip service to freedom but who chortled with glee while riot cops bashed young people’s heads because members of occupy dared disrupt the precious social order by using their freedom of assembly. Does freedom mean merely the freedom to earn and buy? But not, I guess, the freedom to band together if I don’t agree with you, or if you represent a class of urban young people I don’t like, or whatever. In that case, shut up, be invisible, and Obey. That struck me as sad throughout, and it still strikes me as sad and as a fundamental inability to understand that liberty entails the obligation to make space for people and ideas you do not like.
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
- I am now on sabbatical
- Matt Yglesias illustrates the problem with strict market logic
- Umbrellas, racialized images, and the small things of service
- John McPhee on Writing at the New Yorker
- Greenwashing Sins and Big Box Stores As Gentle Green Giants?
- Incompatible land use, externality-shifting American neighbors, or unsustainable practice?
- Calatrava's Liege Train Station
- An essay on books about monetary policy
- LA and California History viewed through Perry Mason and Paul Drake's Hair
- Patricia Hill Collins Keynote Address on the Call to Community Service